ARCHIVE
Guidelines for peer reviewers
Presentation. Is the the article well-structured and the style clear and appropriate to the research?
Abstract. Has an abstract been provided? Does it adequately summarize the key findings/approach of the article?
Length. Reviewers are asked to consider whether the content of the article is of sufficient interest to justify its length. Should the article be shortened or presented in another form?
Methodology. Are methodology and analysis accurate and properly conducted?
References. Does the paper contain appropriate referencing to provide adequate context for the present work? Are in-text and bibliografical references correct and complete?
Originality. Is the work relevant and original? Does it bring significant contributions to what is already known in the literature? Is the research cutting edge or topical?
Impact. Does the article help to expand or further research in its subject area? Is the significance and potential impact of the article high or low?
Presentation. Is the the article well-structured and the style clear and appropriate to the research?
Abstract. Has an abstract been provided? Does it adequately summarize the key findings/approach of the article?
Length. Reviewers are asked to consider whether the content of the article is of sufficient interest to justify its length. Should the article be shortened or presented in another form?
Methodology. Are methodology and analysis accurate and properly conducted?
References. Does the paper contain appropriate referencing to provide adequate context for the present work? Are in-text and bibliografical references correct and complete?
Originality. Is the work relevant and original? Does it bring significant contributions to what is already known in the literature? Is the research cutting edge or topical?
Impact. Does the article help to expand or further research in its subject area? Is the significance and potential impact of the article high or low?